Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spin room

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. – ABCD 02:57, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Spin room
American press neologism dicdef. Recommend transwiki to wikitionary. jdb &#x274b; (talk) 15:25, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's a real, notable phenomenon--it's encyclopedic as a phenomenon, not just as a definition. It's somewhat distinct from the notion of spin itself and media criticism is full of the term and concept. Demi T/C 18:15, 2005 Mar 28 (UTC)
 * Keep and allow for organic growth. --GRider\talk 18:37, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * The phenomenon is spin. This is a definition.  I do not see any way to expand this.  The current content should be transwiki'd.  If someone can expand it during the discussion period, I'll change my vote.  Rossami (talk) 00:44, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and Expand. Article can be expanded to show how spin rooms are used in politics today, or how spin rooms have been used in the past. DaveTheRed 06:00, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.