Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spindle Magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:43, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Spindle Magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm not seeing how this passes muster for an encyclopedia. Laun chba ller 16:33, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:44, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:45, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:45, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:46, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:46, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:46, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:47, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Soldi2019 (talk) 12:47, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't see how this passes either WP:ORGCRIT or WP:WEBCRIT. The only people who seem to mention it anywhere are current and former writers on their own websites or blogs. As a print magazine, it only ran for six issues before moving entirely online, so there's no indication of lasting significance, more like "blink and you missed it". The publisher and editor Heather Falconer sold the brand in 2016, and it now seems to have evolved into a kind of artistic LinkedIn... both creative artists and brands are invited to submit their details for consideration. But as either a print or online magazine, it doesn't appear to pass any notability criteria. Richard3120 (talk) 20:05, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: The article was created with no independent sources and stayed that way for over 7 years. Attempting to find sources on this publication only leads to passing mentions as well as unreliable blogs and primary WP:SOAPBOX sources. Just because it WP:EXISTS doesn't mean it should have an article, especially if there have been no independent sources (or any sources really) added to the article since it was created. StaringAtTheStars ✉Talk 18:49, 15 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.