Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spine (emulator)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 00:08, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Spine (emulator)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not appear to pass WP:GNG. I could only find one article in a secondary source about the emulator, which isn't enough to establish notability. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 22:02, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 22:02, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. –  The Grid  ( talk )  22:17, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Found more coverage in Input Magazine and TechSpot. While I'm not too happy with what I found, the fact that it is the first PS4 emulator software + there being some coverage for the game pushes me towards keeping for now. Jumpytoo Talk 05:41, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
 * TechSpot is a known unreliable source per WP:VG/RS and both of these sources are WP:RUNOFTHEMILL-esque articles. The Pinput one boils down to "It exists. It runs ~300 games." This is not significant coverage. IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 13:28, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
 * TechSpot is in the "Inconclusive" section of VGRS, not the "Unreliable" section. While yeah I'm not happy with the sources either, the emulator is the main topic of all 3 articles which in my view is still SIGCOV, making this emulator just barely pass the bar for GNG. Jumpytoo Talk 20:33, 6 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete as a lacking significant coverage in reliable sources. The best match in known relaible sources is this short news article, which is not sufficient to call it in-depth coverage. IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 13:28, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:SIGCOV. Mann Mann (talk) 15:07, 6 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.