Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spinnaz

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Speedy delete -- Thue | talk 21:16, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Spinnaz
Not only is the subject matter more appropriate to some sort of slang dictionary, it is written in style that is questionable at least. I'll leave it for the more experienced to decide what to do with it. --Shader 17:46, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Speedy Delete as silly (not to mention racist) vandalism that concludes with calling some non-famous person a "wank", and therefore being a personal attack. There might be some debate regarding whether a good article might be made on this topic (though my guess would be no) but we should get rid of it first so it doesn't pollute the page history. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  18:50, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete... please Tygar 18:57, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. IP has left clear vandalism on Etta James, Venice, NASCAR, 1989 in Canada, and Heinrich Himmler. Niteowlneils 20:37, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy deleted. Not a genuine contribution. Thue | talk 21:16, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)