Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spinning Palms Baguazhang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Singu larity  08:11, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Spinning Palms Baguazhang

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

None of the content can be verified with any reliable sources or even any sources for that matter after multiple Google searches failed to show up anything. Apparently this article is about friends of the author, so therefore presents a conflict of interest(Not a reason to delete, I know) but more importantly it seems it is all original thought or something made up one day. And even the articel itself mentions that "not is much known at all about the style" and therefore can't even assert notability of the subject. AngelOfSadness talk  20:58, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Utter nonsense and unverifyable.  //   Chris  (complaints) • (contribs) 23:43, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete junk. JuJube (talk) 10:26, 23 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete. And soon. Lawrence  §  t / e  18:38, 24 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.