Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spirit Combat (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:22, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Spirit Combat
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

non-notable Peter Rehse (talk) 04:07, 9 April 2012 (UTC) (categories)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.Peter Rehse (talk) 04:12, 9 April 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm going to hedge on Speedy Delete G4 (repost). Will be tagged momentarily.  This was deleted over four years ago, and I am unable to tell if the article is a substantial duplicate thereof.  -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 07:25, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have declined the G4 speedy, as this is a considerably fuller article than the one deleted four years ago, which was only three lines. Best to let this AfD run. JohnCD (talk) 19:02, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - the speedy was declined; it's not substantially the same. -- Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 05:26, 16 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete This article has no reliable independent sources to support any claims of notability. The tags show there are a lot of issues with this article, but the lack of notability and reliable sources is enough to support deletion. Astudent0 (talk) 17:43, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete The long-term reliance on primary sources is troublesome. Does not appear to meet WikiProject Martial arts notability guidelines. jmcw (talk) 20:18, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete The article is based almost completely on primary sources. I did not find reliable and independent sources that show this art passes WP:MANOTE or WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 04:40, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.