Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spiritual Catharsis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. v/r - TP 22:16, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Spiritual Catharsis

 * – ( View AfD View log )

fails WP:NALBUMS. could not find evidence of charting or indepth third party coverage. google mainly shows customer reviews. All music doesn't even bother to review or rate this album. LibStar (talk) 01:26, 16 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep – and improve with sources. google has 88000 hits on ("Spiritual Catharsis" striborg) some of which are usable. Occuli (talk) 08:34, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * see WP:GOOGLEHITS. Please specify which sources are actually usable and qualify as reliable sources. LibStar (talk) 10:09, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * This, this, this, from the first 100. Obviously this is not a mainstream artist so will not be reviewed in The Times. Occuli (talk) 10:28, 16 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge and categorize the redirect but deletion is not a reasonable option. The sources are of course fairly weak but as Occuli points out, this is to be expected. Pichpich (talk) 12:20, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per the sources Occuli found.  Lugnuts  (talk) 12:34, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 14:07, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.