Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spiritual or Material Problems

Spiritual or Material Problems was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

Original research. --Viriditas | Talk 00:28, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC) This was not a theory to sell anyone on spirituality. It was new theory for solving problems in a material world dominated by spiritually motivated people, like suicide bombers. I thought, if it had potential, other users would ask questions or correct the language. I guess the wikipedia is not a source for new theories. Does anyone know of a popular free source for new theories on the web? I'd hate to think this rapidly changing world of free knowledge is limited to old theories. --Billfmsd
 * Delete. Original research, personal essay, rant, whatever you want to call it, it's not encyclopedic.  -- Antaeus Feldspar 01:24, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * I followed the instructions, and I worked it the number of times as I had in my question, and the result was that I had Cooties and Despair. Delete for original research and Deep Thoughts. Geogre 02:20, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, original research and just weirdly non-encyclopedic. --Spangineer &#8734; 02:35, Dec 17, 2004 (UTC)
 * I am doubting whether to delete or speedy delete. - Andre Engels 02:57, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, original research... or Speedy as patent nonsense. Wyss 03:28, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete --fvw *  03:34, 2004 Dec 17 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original pseudo-philosophy. jni 07:04, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. If being in touch with your spiritual side means you ending up posting nonsense like this, then I'm glad to be materialistic... P Ingerson 07:37, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * del. Mikkalai 08:52, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * I don't know any specific sites for it. But you could always sign up with some free webhosting service. - Andre Engels 09:42, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Wikinfo has more liberal rules about original research, you could try submitting it there .   Shanes 11:45, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete. utcursch 13:24, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.