Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spirofication


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. joe deckertalk to me 19:46, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Spirofication

 * – ( View AfD View log )

It seems that someone is trying to get a neologism some publicity. I can find no evidence whatsoever to support any notability for this word. This article was rightly listed for PROD but after it had expired the template was removed by the original author with no explanation I relisted it for deletion but have had the request turned down as it has already been through the process once, even though it had a decidedly suspect removal first time round. Malcolma (talk) 13:33, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete and Spirofy as obvious self-promoting spam. Also WP:NOT a dictionary, for things made up one day, a blog or promotional site, etc. AlexTiefling (talk) 14:40, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete [Insert Spirograph joke.] EEng (talk) 23:24, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:54, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.