Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Splatter Phoenix


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to List_of_Darkwing_Duck_characters, as already merged. Black Kite 07:58, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Splatter Phoenix

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable Darkwing Duck character - made only two appearances in the show's 60 episode run, nor was ever featured in spinoffs (video games/merchandise/etc) for the show. — Preceding unsigned comment added by McJeff (talk • contribs) 2008/03/12 11:47:35
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:49, 12 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   —Pixelface (talk) 13:52, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   —Pixelface (talk) 13:52, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge into List of Darkwing Duck characters. Articles that can be merged should not be nominated for deletion. --Pixelface (talk) 13:52, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge as per Pixelface -- both clauses, as that's exactly what I'd say myself. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:47, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 *  Delete I've already merged the first paragraph into the List of Darkwing Duck characters replacing the existing entry for this character. I felt the text of this article was much clearer about the character than existing entry, however I did not merge the second paragraph.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 15:37, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * If you've merged any information, the article cannot be deleted but needs to be turned into a redirect in order to preserve the contribution history. --Pixelface (talk) 16:56, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect I guess all it needs now is a redirect to List of Darkwing Duck characters --Pmedema (talk) 15:55, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree, but I've already done a non-admin close once today and don't want to be trigger happy. It might be a good idea to leave the AfD open for a few days in case there are any arguments about individual characters warranting their own articles. Although I think the policy is pretty clear in this case we should probably let this run its course.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 17:01, 12 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.