Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Split Bean Coffee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the nomination was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 20:40, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Split Bean Coffee
Non-notable company. A preliminary attempt to determine notability was conducted through a straw poll (found here) because I didn't know if it was kosher to start an AfD when I myself wasn't sure how I'd vote at that time (it seems like a nomination is a de facto "delete" vote, and possibly a bad faith nomination otherwise, so while I may be wrong I wanted to play it safe). No one who participated in the straw poll thought the company was notable, so it's now becoming an AfD to decide the ultimate fate of the article. --Icarus (Hi!) 18:01, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete although it would only take another significant source or so to sway me. As of now, though, it doesn't meet WP:CORP. --djrobgordon 18:34, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep non-notability is not a reason for deletion, and there is nothing wrong with the article. It is short and factual.  — Chris Capoccia  T&#8260;C 19:30, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Non-notability is a reason for deletion. Notability and Notability (organizations) are both recognised here and even referenced at the top of the page. ➨  ЯEDVERS  19:51, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment technically, one of those is an essay and the other is proposed policy. I strongly support them, however, because without them WP:VAIN becomes meaningless. --Icarus (Hi!) 23:31, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Chris Capoccia is correct. Non-notability is not a criterion for deletion except in certain circumstances, and it is quite irritating that people keep using it as such. — Reinyday, 15:54, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * In all circumstances, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, with a minimum threshhold of significance below which articles are not included. You may disagree about where that threshhold is or whether a certain article meets it, but nevertheless others have given that threshhold the name "notability", and it is a valid criterion for deletion. —Centrx→talk &bull; 06:21, 12 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete very worthy but Top Five Artisan Marshmallows doesn't amount to notability IMHO   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  21:02, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not warrant an encyclopedia article. See also WP:CORP and Talk:Split Bean Coffee. —Centrx→talk &bull; 06:23, 12 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.