Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Split Mind


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   16:14, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Split Mind
Delete - Non-notable film. Article was deprodded by author without explanation, so bringing it to AFD. Brian G 17:06, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - Good, sophisticated article representing short film. Considered by author to be noteworthy, thus opinion-based, and non-negotiable. User:Dmar198
 * Delete per nom. "Considered by author to be noteworthy, thus opinion-based, and non-negotiable."?!  It doesn't matter what the author thinks, it matters whether the video satisfies Wikipedia notability guidelines.  And it doesn't. &mdash;   Da rk Sh ik ar i   talk /contribs  17:25, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Alright, fine. You can delete it. Maybe it shouldn't have been posted after all. Sorry for any inconvenience. User:Dmar198
 * Its fine. This sort of thing happens all the time: welcome to Wikipedia!  Remember to sign your posts with four tildes ( ~ ).  I probably did bite a bit there, but don't take it personally.  A lot of people make these sorts of mistakes, and its not a big deal. &mdash;   Da rk Sh ik ar i   talk /contribs  17:58, 7 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Not even well-known on YouTube, no less anywhere else. Only about 100 views, 2 comments, and 0 ratings. Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day, even if it was for an assignment. Note that the de-prodder (and only keep vote so far) is from the guy who created the movie. --Icarus (Hi!) 19:16, 7 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - I am the director of the movie, who posted the keep vote. I have since changed my mind, but I will leave the "keep" up there for certain reasons, and as you can see I now vote "delete". I was just going to say that the "not for things made in school" reason for deletion does not apply here, as that refers to ideas or words and things of the abstract nature, not specifically to projects that were made during school. There have been many notable things done in school that I am sure would make good articles on Wikipedia. Now, though, I do agree that for other reasons Split Mind probably should not be on wikipedia. Once again, sorry for any inconvenience I have made with my video or my postings on this discussion of the Split Mind article. User:Dmar198
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.