Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spoeank

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE (done by Zanimum). jni 13:12, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Spoeank
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete, useless jargon. YannisKollias 13:04, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete neologism, not in general use. Kappa 13:14, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Ah. More tiny groups of students making up words.  And they so want the cachet of getting their words into the dictionary ... that they add them to the encyclopaedia instead &mdash; without a definition, to boot. Delete. Uncle G 14:13, 2005 Feb 6 (UTC)
 * Gehridoett (Translated: DELETE)--ZayZayEM 15:04, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of widespread use. JoaoRicardo 19:53, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)