Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spongecell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 14:58, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Spongecell

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Spam advert heavily edited by a succession of IPs and WP:SPA accounts with heavy WP:COI. Company fails WP:N and has no WP:RS, just self-generated Internet presence, mentions in blogs, etc. Qworty (talk) 22:47, 25 January 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - Without knowing anything about the COI issue, I see there are just three sources with shallow or trivial coverage, which is already insufficient to base an article on. --WTFITS (talk) 03:21, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.