Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spontaneous combustion petro chemicals


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Stormie 04:44, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

Spontaneous combustion petro chemicals
I'm not quite sure this topic merits its own article. Perhaps should be merged into somewhere else? 202.156.6.59 00:58, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Patent nonsense. Stuff can explode? What? D. G. 02:55, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject is undefined, original authors grammar is beyond redemption, if the author is referring to the reactions used to propel some ICBM's then that subject is covered elsewhere. /Rjayres 04:44, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. --Nlu 08:16, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - Spontaneous combustion is when things go on fire. I.e. When these [two] chemicals react, they form a flame or a fire. I'd say it's notable. Possibly merge with Spontaneous combustion. --Kilo-Lima 10:50, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Actually, what you're describing is hypergolic combustion. -- Carnildo 20:29, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I see; OK. Delete. -- Kilo-Lima 15:15, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - Nothing salvageable, it even lacks clarity as a dicdef. -- Rune Welsh | &tau;&alpha;&lambda;&kappa; | Esperanza  14:23, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete blatant tosh. 195.144.130.1 15:21, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and merge info from the Spontaneous combustion disamb page. I did a minor clean-up - page needs to be renamed if kept - remove the petro. Vsmith 15:50, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment - OK maybe merge with autoignition temperature to help fill out that brief article. the subject of the article is real. Just the original writing was poorly done. Vsmith 15:59, 17 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Merge with Hypergolic (and rename that article as appropriate). --Carnildo 20:29, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge. I don't know a lot about the subject but I don't believe it needs its own article. Also, the title isn't written correctly (It's Spontaneous combustion of petro chemicals I would think.) -Haon 21:39, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge useful content (and there isn't much) with Spontaneous combustion. Denni &#9775; 01:33, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Very, very little useable content to merge into spontaneous combustion.  I have a degree in biochemistry and have taken courses in advanced physical chemistry.  This article is subpar.  Articles like this are why Wikipedia is criticized for its lack of experts writing articles.  The material could be covered in the article on spontaneous combustion or the article on hypergolic rocket fuels.  (both of those articles are not very well written either).  The article title "Spontaneous combustion petro chemicals" by the way makes no sense.&mdash; Gaff  ταλκ 02:28, 18 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.