Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spooky Southcoast


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:36, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Spooky Southcoast

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Insufficient indication of notability Iago Qnsi  (talk) 18:28, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:09, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:09, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:09, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: No evidence that the subject, a local radio show, meets the GNG. The sources given are either primary or a fleeting mention, and no kidding: any radio station with streaming capability has a "potential worldwide audience."  Well, no kidding; I've had blogs on LiveJournal and Blogger going back 15 years or so, and I've got hits from the UK, Russia and Uruguay.  Doesn't make ME notable.   Ravenswing   03:51, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:14, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Single-station local radio programs don't pass WP:NMEDIA unless the sourcing is really solid, but of the three sources here two of them are primary sources and the third just glancingly namechecks the show's existence rather than being substantively about it. And Ravenswing is entirely correct that in 2016, when almost every radio station in existence has a live webstream and individual programs frequently get reupped as podcasts, almost every radio program that exists at all could self-promotionally claim to have a worldwide audience — so "worldwide audience because stream/podcast" isn't an inclusion freebie under WP:NMEDIA either, if reliable source coverage about the show isn't present to demonstrate that the program is actually getting any significant degree of international attention. So no, none of this is good enough. Bearcat (talk) 19:57, 12 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.