Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spoomusic.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 01:21, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Spoomusic.com
Recording company with its very own myspace page. Article submitted by its founder. Fails WP:CORP (Fails WP:WEB, too, in case it applies to them.)-- Perfecto 03:13, 23 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. --Perfecto 03:13, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn "label" Ruby 03:44, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - and as an editorial comment, why anyone would want to name their company after Spoo is beyond me -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 03:54, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --NaconKantari (話)|(郵便) 03:55, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete pn - cf Ramenboy Avi 05:31, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * delete: No evidence of notability.  Ombudsman 05:40, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable corporation & non-notable website. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-23 07:37Z 
 * Delete un notable spammy and vanity:. &mdash;This user has left wikipedia  12:25 2006-01-23
 * Delete nn. Mushintalk 14:23, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. Sue Anne 20:54, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable. Latinus 22:00, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete warpozio 08:38, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 1/24/2006 from the contributor: I erased everything aside from the vital statistics that can be verified. If spoomusic.com is considered non-notable then we have to go through the list of independant record labels and delete a huge majority of them. Please consider that notability for an independant record label differs than a mainstream label. The funding usually isn't there but the listeners are. Spoomusic.com doesn't sell CDs, but gives the music away free, so there won't ever be a gold or platinum acknowledgement to base notability on... This is a progressive record label in that respect, and I thought it notable for this reason. But I even erased this information, just leaving vitals which can be confirmed through an Arizona government web site listed in the discussion section of this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.3.81.251 (talk • contribs)
 * I agree with the contributor regarding List of independent record labels. However I believe the contributor confuses Verifiability with Verifiability (c.f. Notability/Essay).  Since "record label" directly establishes notability for musicians which indirectly establishes notability for songs, thousands of unverified labels, musicians, albums and songs have articles.  FWIW we've been indiscriminate. --Perfecto  00:21, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable James084 00:35, 25 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.