Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spoon Guru


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:18, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Spoon Guru

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable company. Fails WP:ORGIND. scope_creep (talk) 08:55, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 10:54, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 10:54, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 10:54, 6 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete No notable. Written by a sock it appears. Paid editing. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 11:07, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete The Telegraph is the only source that comes close to being useful for meeting WP:CORP but that's clearly just a piece of churnalism rather than real, independent coverage. This is just yet another small start up that has paid someone to promote them here. SmartSE (talk) 13:18, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete SmartSE hit it on the head with the churnalism comment. Sources do not go into proper and verifiable depth to warrant an article.  As it stands, it is very nearly unambiguous advertising.  Unfortunately, there are many articles on Wikipedia that are of similar quality- non-notable startups with a distinct flavor of paid promotion.  Jip Orlando (talk) 13:35, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability not established. Appears to be promotional. DaveApter (talk) 18:36, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Coverage exists but it is mentions or routine announcements such as partnerships and hiring of executives. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. --CNMall41 (talk) 23:11, 6 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.