Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spoon sex position

Another copulatory how-to. Much less objectionable than the others, due to truth in titling, but it is still a sex manual entry. Geogre 13:12, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)


 * We shouldn't attempt to censor contributions for being explicit, (though warnings may be appropriate); but how about http://wikibooks.org/wiki/Sex_Manual ? Dunc_Harris|&#9786; 14:52, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * No problem at all with the content's subject, just with its being a how-to. To me, this is no different from a recipe for a food for which I haven't the ingredients at hand.  I also think it's not really that necessary an instruction -- kind of obvious -- but it's the how-to that's the basis of my listing. Geogre 15:35, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, there's more content than just a "how-to" section. I don't see how this qualifies as "explicit". -Sean Curtin 23:48, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * It blathers on too much about a very simple position. It should redirect to some more extensive article or manual.    &mdash; Chameleon My page/My talk 14:09, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's a how-to with some extra BS padding. The spoon position is popular as it has no power gradient -- that must be why lefties always do it that way. What, they don't? Never mind. Wile E. Heresiarch 01:12, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Move to Sexual positions or similar and delete. Info worth keeping, but no need to tie up disambig pages for this. Denni &#9775; 02:20, 2004 Jul 11 (UTC)
 * Delete, as above. Jeeves 07:09, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Comment: If this gets deleted, what about the dozen or so other articles linked from list of sex positions? -Sean Curtin 07:19, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. No censorship on Wikipeia, please. Andy Mabbett 07:30, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Seems to have been improved a lot since first listed.  Noisy 12:38, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)


 * Comment: It was listed for being a how-to. A description of a position & explanation of what it is is not the same thing as "Lift your leg and turn to the right while...."  The article has improved and is less of a manual entry. (Since I did the listing, I don't have a vote to change.) Geogre 13:43, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)


 * Keep. I see no particular reason to delete it other than prudity -- and we'd have to delete a lot of pages as a previous commentator noted. Aris Katsaris 12:29, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC) (Vote moved here from vfd main space by Graham &#9786; | Talk)