Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SportChassis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:05, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

SportChassis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Having searched for SportChassis LLC in Google and Bing, as well as viewed the references, I don't believe this article meets WP:Corp. Ormr2014 (talk) 21:41, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I couldn't find enough good refferences, but all of the history is based off what is said on the company's history website; SportChassis History. Seqqis (talk) 21:50, 11 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Probably delete - News searches here and here and Books searches here found nothing significant or notable. SwisterTwister   talk  05:04, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Split content This page is not well-developed enough (and really cannot be) as its own entry.  The company exists as a sub-manufacturer of Freightliner Trucks and all its products are variants of the Freightliner Business Class M2.  It would be better to integrate this content into both of these articles and delete the SportChassis stub afterwards.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:44, 18 May 2015 (UTC) *Keep, very similar stuff exists, also I'm pleased with the sources, notability is there. SilverSurfingSerpent (talk) 16:33, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep, there is sufficient other similar articles for the auto industry to establish precedent to keep. Unless you would like to delete all those articles also.--Degen Earthfast (talk) 10:22, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Strike as by blocked sockpuppet. Davewild (talk) 21:10, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:08, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails Notability (companies), above keep votes are invalid per WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS not being a valid argument. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Yes, this, and things like it, might belong in parent/patron company, or an article about this class of rebuild, but not alone. If this isn't notable enough to get a paragraph in the Freightliner article, or a general aftermarket rebuild article,  then it certainly isn't worth its own. Anmccaff (talk) 14:04, 27 May 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.