Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sporting Shooters' Association of Australia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Redirect Eluchil404 04:59, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Sporting Shooters' Association of Australia
There is a larger article on the same subject: Sporting Shooters Association of Australia. The SSAA have said there is no apostrophe in their name, and it seems redundant to have an article stub with a mis-spelt title when there is a larger article on the same topic- with the correct title- on Wikipedia.--Commander Zulu 03:00, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * delete if the information is identical, Merge if different. Adambiswanger1 03:06, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Fan1967 03:08, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect is an appropriate course of action here as it is a plausible search term. Capitalistroadster 03:13, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Capitalistroadster 03:13, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect Ans  e  ll  04:42, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Capitalistroadster. SM247 05:37, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect --Ter e nce Ong 08:37, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Why is this on AfD? -- GWO
 * Speedy redirect --Peta 23:53, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I just redirected it. Delete does not fit as the contribution history is important for the redirect page as Commander Zulu copied the content over recently. Someone should possibly close this, or undo my action in the event it was wrong. Ans  e  ll  23:11, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Also should not be deleted as it is the version of their name that they officially use, they have the apostrophe on their website name Ans  e  ll  23:14, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Also should not be deleted as it is the version of their name that they officially use, they have the apostrophe on their website name Ans  e  ll  23:14, 8 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.