Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sportpursuit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 12:41, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Sportpursuit

 * – ( View AfD View log )

lack of of significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP GermanKity (talk) 12:18, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 12:18, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 12:18, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 12:18, 22 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - blatant spam, WP:REFBOMBed - David Gerard (talk) 14:36, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per David Gerard. REFBOMBed and the overall structure of the article as of now is very poor.  Ken Tony  Shall we discuss? 17:40, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Signifiant coverage not found and lack of indepth source. Fails to meet noability guidelines. TheDreamBoat (talk) 04:52, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - not passing notability criteria --Rupertdonovan (talk) 23:45, 28 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.