Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sports broadcasting contracts in Indonesia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 03:02, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Sports broadcasting contracts in Indonesia

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Blank page, not necessary and appears to be a placeholder of some kind. Rasputin72 (talk) 06:35, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Please be more careful. The author removed your AfD notice, but they also added content  in the same edit that you removed by undo.  Bradjamesbrown (talk) 07:12, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment supported speedy action - the Indonesian project has a notorious record of inadequate WP:NOT candidates in the attempts at articles regarding media - usually devoid of adequate WP:N, WP:V and WP:RS - and if any content - in most cases deletable SatuSuro 07:29, 10 January 2010 (UTC) - however similar articles exist - without anything that resembles a WP:RS - difficult - as either all the grab bag of links articles are in the same context SatuSuro 08:30, 10 January 2010 (UTC) If this becomes a delete then there are the other 12 or so grab bag articles as well at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Sports_television SatuSuro 13:14, 10 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete: I note there is no actual information there, nor can I envisage much of an article being created. Also, fails notability. --Merbabu (talk) 10:07, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I can see where a good article could be written, although, so far, this isn't it, so no keep !vote. The topic of which of a nation's television networks have contracted for exclusive rights to sports broadcasting is quite notable (see, for example, Category:Sports television in the United States).  For English-language Wikipedia readers, one has to assume that we don't know anything about Indonesia's television networks, and that it requires the same explanation that someone in Indonesia would need to understand about ABC, NBC, and CBS.  Truth be told, Americans know almost nothing about Indonesia, a nation of 230,000,000 people, fourth largest in the world, that gets almost no mention in the news.  Mandsford (talk) 17:02, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:46, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete for being entirely devoid of content. A single sentence that says nothing and a couple of templates is not an article. -- Whpq (talk) 22:04, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. Maybe if the nominator had given the article creator more than 48 seconds to add content before slapping on deletion tags we would have a better article now. Phil Bridger (talk) 16:18, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - in view of the comments from Mansford and Phil Bridger - and that the nominator proceeded to become a blocked user - I believe this Afd should be closed as incorrect usage of the AFD process SatuSuro 23:26, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - But that does not address the fact that the article as it stands has no content. -- Whpq (talk) 23:35, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thats fine - just compare the lot at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Sports_television SatuSuro 23:38, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW ( Talk ) 18:09, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, it's a start. Polarpanda (talk) 10:15, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Userfy - Since the article was put for deletion, it has yet to see improvement. It could become a worthy article at some point but it's been a pretty much useless, obscure/specialized stub for 14 days.--70.80.234.196 (talk) 18:54, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD, as this article/list provides no context, nor claim to notability, nor any sources to veryify its content or define its subject matter. --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 16:46, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.