Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sportsjournalists.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. AndyZ 22:00, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Sportsjournalists.com
Notable? -- Zanimum 20:46, 4 May 2006 (UTC) BrooklynSK delete —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BrooklynSK (talk • contribs).
 * Delete &mdash; fails to establish notability per WP:WEB └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 21:00, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Subwayguy 23:52, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * With that kind of endorsement, it almost seems a crime to say delete. I guess it makes it easier to sort out the sockpuppets, though. Confusing Manifestation 01:11, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete If the author can't even come up with a reason to keep it, why should we? Fails WP:WEB, and sounds like fancruft to me. M1ss1ontomars2k4 01:57, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete because. Danny Lilithborne 04:07, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. There are a lot of notable people on the site, but I don't think that makes the site itself encyclopedic. TheProject 06:58, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per UkPaolo. DarthVad e r 11:59, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:WEB. -- ReyBrujo 21:01, 5 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.