Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spotsylvania Towne Centre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete this bunch of stores in Spotsylvania. Gwen Gale (talk) 19:32, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Spotsylvania Towne Centre

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Apparently non-notable mall in Virginia. Found a couple sources pertaining to remodeling and the addition of a Costco, but none seemed substantial in content. I think I once saw something claiming this to be the first mall-based Costco, which might make for notability; however, I can't seem to find the source that said so. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 13:24, 24 May 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions.   --  Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 13:24, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletion discussions.   --  Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 13:24, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 20:19, 30 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails to meet my understanding of our generally accepted inclusion criteria.  Rossami (talk) 23:04, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, it's an article about a run of the mill mall, and it only cites one source. We don't need it. GO-PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 00:12, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
 * A "we dont need it" argument is not a valid reasoning as it tends to rely on the WP:IDONTLIKEIT reasoning. Who are we to decide what is/is not "needed" in an encyclopedia ? Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  10:50, 31 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. I say keep it, it just needs to be updated some. CRocka05 (talk) 06:36, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per crocka05, a 28 year old mall has had a lot of history at this point, lets keep itMyheartinchile (talk) 23:42, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete since at the moment I don't see compliance with WP:ORG. This is not a super-regional mall and there are not reliable sources citing anything special or notable about the place. The article includes two local paper reports on a major refurbishment but such remodeling's routinely take place and are reported at very many malls. Smile a While (talk) 03:34, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep because it doesn't have ads.Morefight (talk) 17:56, 21 November 2008 (UTC)Morefight

Morefight (talk) 18:06, 21 November 2008 (UTC)Morefight ''' ==]]
 * 1) It's a mall
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.