Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spott, East Lothian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy keep. Per many precedents, an article about a verifiable place is not going to be deleted. Thryduulf (talk) 21:46, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Spott, East Lothian

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Incredibly small place in the UK (the article doesn't even say it's in the UK, had to Google it). [Belinrahs|talktome⁄ ididit] 18:28, 15 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep', places of human habitation are notable enough to sustain an article. Mjroots (talk) 18:31, 15 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep There has been endless discussion on whether inhabited places are inherently notable, without any consensus having been reached. However, I am of the opinion that even an article on a small village may be useful to someone. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:34, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 18:52, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Err, why? This place is in Scotland. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:30, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

keep I am still learning this process and am willing to learn.Surely it would be better to point out my errors and help rather than simply take the easy route and say delete. Regarding not mentioning it as being in the UK, there must be several thousands of items in the UK but do not mention it on the Wikipedia artcile. I am prepared to be helped and learn but if the atitude is simply to delete, then I would happily go along with that and quit Wikipedia. I am sure though, the majority would not simply delete --Jimmydenham (talk) 19:12, 15 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment I agree with Jimmydenham. He is new to Wikipedia, and has written some good articles. Helping him to know how they might be still better is constructive.


 * Keep per JBW UltraMagnusspeak 20:09, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions.  -- Martin 4 5 1  (talk) 20:41, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: A village. Joe Chill (talk) 21:20, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.