Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SpringML, Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star  Mississippi  15:31, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

SpringML, Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Nomination per reasons in WP:SERIESA. This is a highly promotional article about a fairly minor company about which most sources are PR; can't find much to satisfy WP:ORGDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. This is the author's only contribution to Wikipedia thus far. FalconK (talk) 10:06, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 10:06, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 10:06, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:27, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. There might be a small chance that the company might meet a notability threshold, but this article is pure promotion. Especially the over-use of the "solution" term clearly indicates it was written by a marketing shill. W Nowicki (talk) 16:09, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Hi FalconK FalconK (talk), I am glad you are helping me in my journey of creating the company page and making it more reliable. For the reason - WP:SERIESA, my team & I have tried our best to remove all the links that direct to SpringML’s website. SpringML continues to contribute to the IT and cloud industry, understanding the solutions written on the page are mentioned in a single line and may be found very brief. We are working on elaborating the text by (date) so as for readers to understand the solutions provided in-depth which could resolve the problem WP:ORGDEPTH and for WP:ORGIND I am willing to change the tonality of the content and make it less promotional and more informative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiauthor37 (talk • contribs) 09:38, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * It's not that, though I appreciate it. It's that the company, in business though it is, doesn't appear to have done anything that might merit significant 3rd party coverage in reliable sources.  Check WP:CORPDEPTH again.  If the purpose of the article is to allow readers to understand the solutions provided by the company (it's not your own company, I hope?), well, that'd be advertising.  FalconK (talk) 10:35, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi, @FormalDude and @FalkonK, the links that are insufficient to provide trustworthiness have been removed. My team and I do not own the company, we are here to mark its achievements and contribute to public knowledge. SpringML since 2017 has come up with solutions that have helped many governments in the US adapt and implement the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiauthor37 (talk • contribs) 04:34, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom. Sources do not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. –– FormalDude   talk  15:29, 31 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.