Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spring High School stabbing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 04:57, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Spring High School stabbing

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article has been listed for merger with 0 participation since January. Article does not meet the guidelines for criminal events at WP:CRIME. John from Idegon (talk) 21:43, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:10, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:10, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:10, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:10, 31 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep There seems to be quite a lot of coverage not yet in article discussing this brawl both in the context of Hispanic v. Black ethnic tensions that led up to it, and as coverage of school, community efforts to mend the problems in the years after the attack.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Also, in general, I dislike merging notable crimes into school articles because it tends to give WP:UNDUE weight within the overall coverage of the school.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:19, 31 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep per Greg. Cyrus the Penner (talk) 21:06, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per Greg. ThatGirlTayler (talk) 06:01, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - per sources, and per the fact that the article needs expansion of sources and improvements overall. But those reasons are no reasons for deletion.BabbaQ (talk) 16:58, 3 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.