Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Springbox (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:24, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Springbox (company)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable under WP:CORP guideline. Sources found after PROD attempt are a routine exec profile, local Austin media, trivial mention (Advertising Age: "LatinWorks will be the lead agency, and work with Springbox..."), or own company's press releases and rehashes of same (App Developer magazine: "Mobile1st has announced the launch of a new product ..."). Additional concerns listed at Conflict of interest noticeboard. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:31, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I would also add that the article is written like an advertisement. Elliot321 (talk) 15:41, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I considered nominating it myself.  Toddst1 (talk) 15:17, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:34, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:35, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:36, 15 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails GNG, references fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. Other reasons as per nom. -- HighKing ++ 13:07, 22 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.