Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Springer Public School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Of note is that after the article was nominated for deletion, it was copy edited (by another user) to remove promotional elements from the article. North America1000 01:28, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Springer Public School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An unreferenced, non notable Primary school in India. Winner 42 Talk to me!  14:13, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Spam for non-notable primary school Jimfbleak - talk to me?  15:46, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 30 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment. This is a K–12 school (teaching to Class XII). "English medium" refers to the language of instruction. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. No references. Spam. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 07:37, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Terrible article, but as a secondary school kept per longstanding precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:03, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES., would you reconsider our deletion rationale/nomination based on the fact that this is a scondary school? Boleyn (talk) 08:59, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment I accept that it is a secondary school, but the article is very promotional in tone, eg the school does not spare any effort in rendering its services to all people, and unless it's cleaned up I'm content for the AFD to run Jimfbleak - talk to me?  10:36, 2 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep for all  the reasons documented at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Spammy  yes, but  that's the way  English  is always written and spoken in  this part  of the world. Needs cleaning  up. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:10, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Yes, the article was spammy and I tried to improve it; removed promotional material, re-arranged the content, c/ed a bit, removed repetitive sentences. I was not able to find anything notable to add but I believe it's in a better state than before. &mdash;  Yash! (Y) 19:41, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - are your issues addressed appropriately? &mdash;  Yash!  (Y) 19:46, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Mine are, feel free to snow this shut if you'd like. I was not aware that this was a secondary school at the time of nomination as I am not familiar with the Indian educational system (the article didn't help too much either). Winner 42  Talk to me!  20:50, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
 * There are two standing delete votes so that shouldn't be done. It is just few hours away from closing anyway. &mdash;  Yash! (Y) 21:36, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm reasonably happy with the amended version, so I have no objections if someone closes this as Keep Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:06, 4 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep '- Per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES - Needs improving not deleting. – Davey 2010 Talk 05:19, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:42, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES - Needs a lot of work, but we've established that articles on secondary schools are considered notable, so long as the school exists. Jacona (talk) 11:56, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, although there is not much verifiable hope of expansion. Esquivalience t 00:10, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.