Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sprint 8


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 14:49, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Sprint 8

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article is poorly referenced. References do not conform to WP:RS. References were obviously Googled without being checked for relevance. No indication that the subject is worthy of note. Possible advertising as "Sprint 8" appears to be a commercially marketed program. Ioeth (talk contribs twinkle friendly) 16:36, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:25, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable product, service, or exercise routine. I cannot believe that people are actually marketing sprints and interval training as something new! Yasso 800s on the other hand should be in Wikipedia. Location (talk) 18:55, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Not Delete I suggest that the article not be deleted. the topic is notable. I have included two links, one from LA Times, that talks about the merits of Sprint 8. . cheers --Wireless Fidelity Class One 05:41, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:19, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Not only unsourced and non-notable, but incredibly dangerous. You want some breath when you finish an exercise routine.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 00:49, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The articles from the Times seem to be more of the human interest sort.  Seems like Yet Another workout. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 06:12, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.