Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spruce Creek Fly-In


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 23:01, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Spruce Creek Fly-In

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No coverage in secondary sources. No notability. There currently isn't a guideline for notability of airports but going by WikiProject Airports/Notability, Spruce Creek wouldn't make it. Dismas |(talk) 23:48, 20 November 2008 (UTC) I listed the article at the aviation groupChildofMidnight (talk) 05:15, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I think the appropriate experts should weigh in, but I would lean towards deletion. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:13, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm actually tending towards a keep. The criteria suggest stronger requirements for private airports, but according to the article it was originally constructed for the US military, which would give the place military significance. (Can we cut down on the external links?) - Mgm|(talk) 09:21, 21 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - Meets

General Aviation airports

General aviation (civilian non-airline) airports which meet one of the following criteria are considered notable:


 * it is currently or formerly owned by a local, regional or national government entity

Airports not meeting these criteria may still independently achieve notability per WP:RS and WP:N guidelines.


 * Military or government airfields

Current or former military or government airfields are notable as airports if they meet basic notability

Mjroots (talk) 18:04, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Not only extensive FAA records alone exist on every operating airport in the US, it also is the subject of additional secondary sources. --Oakshade (talk) 02:01, 22 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - Meets notability requirements. --Pilotboi / talk / contribs 18:59, 23 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.