Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spurl

Spurl was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was

Delete: advertisement, and seems to be a website of no particular importance Bitt 21:47, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * No Vote, this was posted by the above user on August 11th, but no archive exists, this does seem to be an ad, but I'm not sure that the statement "a website of no particular importance" is true. -Vina 05:08, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Wikipedia isn't a web guide, even if that's not the name of the policy, and this is advertising. Geogre 12:21, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Advert for web service.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 04:00, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - T&#949;x  &#964;  ur&#949;  17:09, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep if it is a genuine webservice, and NPOV. Mark Richards 19:56, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete --Yath 22:40, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)