Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SquareGo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:51, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

SquareGo

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No evidence of notability. The only references are to the business's own site and a press release. Searches have produced very little coverage, and none at all in reliable third party sources. This appears to be a promotional article. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:48, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  MrKIA11 (talk) 12:14, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

I would question this assertion, as even comparing it to a similar publication PC Gamer there are only a couple of third party references and the rest are the magazine's own links and those of the publishing company. Surely similar deletions would need be made for almost every similar informational article regarding a publication. Colonel finn (talk) 13:20, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * See WP:OTHERSTUFF. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:47, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Exactly, If other articles such as PC Gamer also don't meet the notability guidelines an AFD can be created at a future point for that article. That in itself should not be a reason to keep this.--174.90.78.3 (talk) 17:27, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:15, 29 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:16, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:32, 13 July 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.