Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Square Toiletries (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  15:43, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Square Toiletries
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete No indications of notability, references are either broken or are not intellectually independent (i.e. they rely on company announcements or interviews or are run-of-the-mill business listings). Fails GNG and WP:NCORP. I'm aware this article was nominated a short time ago but the nomination was withdrawn. After reviewing the previous AfD, I believe there was enough reason to continue with the AfD. -- HighKing ++ 14:19, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 14:28, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 14:28, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 14:29, 28 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep The dead links were easily repaired. Between the references and further reading there is easily significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable, secondary sources, so the topic meets WP:GNG and WP:CORP. --Worldbruce (talk) 03:37, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Quick question .. can you link here to any references you believe meet the criteria for establishing notability?  HighKing++ 14:41, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I would start with this 15-page chapter, written by a notable academic, in a book from a scholarly press: Of the other sources listed in the article, my top three picks would be  The remainder do not go into as much depth, but are useful for specific points, and per WP:CORPDEPTH may be combined to help establish notability. (It would also be profitable to search by brand. Some, like Meril, are arguably better known than the company that makes them.) --Worldbruce (talk) 01:27, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep and move to Square Group of Industries - One of the notable conglomerates in Bangladesh. This one is a subsidiary of the group. We can keep this as a section of the parent. - Mar11 (talk) 06:32, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment We'd still need references that meet the criteria for establishing notabilty...  HighKing++ 14:41, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * It would be useful to have an article on Square Group (Bangladesh) (or whatever the best title would be) in order to tie together Samson H. Chowdhury, Tapan Chowdhury, Anjan Chowdhury (executive), Square Pharmaceuticals, Square Toiletries, Square Textiles, Maasranga Television, and the remaining half-dozen (maybe not notable) subsidiaries. Square Toiletries, however, has the notability to stand on its own, even if it isn't much of an article right now, so I'm not sure it makes sense to re-purpose it as the conglomerate parent. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:49, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep- Meets GNG, here is a profile on the company by The Daily Star, the largest circulated English Language newspaper in Bangladesh.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 21:44, 30 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.