Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Squared Circle Wrestling


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 09:43, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Squared Circle Wrestling

 * — (View AfD)

Small promotion, that got very little notable google hits. Wikipedia isn't a guide to every promotion ever. Just because a promotion has featured known stars, doesn't make it known enough for Wikipedia. Many indy promotions get popular stars to wrestle, all of those promotions certainly aren't notable enough for articles here. RobJ1981 20:20, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No assertion of notability, fails WP:CORP. One Night In Hackney 16:45, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Obviously, this is someone from the Rochester area. Jealous ?
 * Delete. Not notable. &spades; P  M  C  &spades; 20:30, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

mrpality 15:40, 11 January 2007 (UTC) The biggest weekend in 2CW's albeit short history is mere days away and only now does someone decide that the 2CW entry is a candidate for deletion. It is clear that this involves someone who considers themselves competition and is trying to discredit us in any way possible.


 * Keep Many other indy feds of similar or smaller size have wikis. This has only been proposed for deletion because of wars between feds.  08:22, 14 January 2007 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.66.9.128 (talk • contribs), 6th edit, all wrestling related.
 * Delete, nn promotion.  Dei zio  talk 09:51, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. This wasn't proposed because of "wars between feds". This was proposed because it's a small indy fed that didn't turn up much on Google. Wikipedia isn't the guide to every indy fed in the world. RobJ1981 23:33, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Keep mrpality I would invite you to do a search for '2CW' on either Google, MySpace, or YouTube and you will see that we are a fed that is on the rise and not what you would call non-notable. We're only a year old, perhaps that is the hangup here?
 * Another comment. Anyone can make videos on YouTube, and anyone can make a MySpace account. Both of those aren't valid sources. RobJ1981 20:42, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.