Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Squarepeg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:35, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Squarepeg
Non-notable playground game. No Google results referring to this. Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day, which this quite literally is. Created by a brand-new user who may not have been aware of Wikipedia's standards for notability. Kafziel 13:38, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. NawlinWiki 13:45, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The article describes a ball game. It cites no sources at all, and I can find no sources describing this game.  The problem with this article is nothing to do with notability.  WP:NFT is unrelated to notability.  It does not mention notability at all.  The problem with this article are the problems with this sort of article that WP:NFT discusses, namely that it is unverifiable and, being the never-before-published documentation for a novel game, original research.  The place for this is the author's own web site, not Wikipedia.  Delete. Uncle G 13:49, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom -- Whpq 14:09, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Please see square which sits under Playground Games for reference to this game. I was unable to cite square as there is direct link to it on Wikipeadia (this is my first time at creating a new entry) -- user:Jamieparkins
 * If you wish to demonstrate that this is not original research, please cite sources. Wikipedia is not a source.  Please cite a book or an article in an academic journal that describes this purported game.  Uncle G 15:40, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete —  WP:OR and NN M  a  rtinp23  20:17, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. TJ Spyke 19:31, 17 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.