Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Squeequo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:18, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

Squeequo
Admitted neologism. Possibly a patent nonsense candidate. 202.156.6.54 00:42, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as unverifiable nonsense. - Sensor 00:46, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment - the WP:CSD for "patent nonsense" requires that the article consist of nonsensical text or gibberish. This article does not fall within that category. In addition, I don't believe it falls under WP:CSD A1 either, so this is not a candidate for speedy deletion under any of our current criteria. Rob Church Talk 16:48, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Deletiquate neologism. &mdash; Haeleth Talk 20:56, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete G3. Silly vandalism.  --Clay Collier 22:03, 25 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.