Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Squeezeplay (Transformers)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:47, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Squeezeplay (Transformers)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable fictional character, no reliable sources, as usual Black Kite (t) (c) 19:52, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Comment I would generally want this kind of thing deleted, but what about ''Lee's Guide to Loose 1988 Transformers: The Decepticons. Lee's Toy Review magazine, issue #208, March 2010''? BE——Critical __Talk 20:36, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep or Redirect to the Marvel Transformers comic character page. Has some notability. Mathewignash (talk) 21:21, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - Actually List of characters in Transformers comics is only about the characters that aren't Autobot or Decepticon. We really need more character lists. NotARealWord (talk) 13:52, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:27, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Redirect for having sources... but only trivial mentions. Someone could always undo the redirect and expand the article once significant out of universe information were available... allowing this to pass WP:GNG and WP:NOT. Shooterwalker (talk) 16:58, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable even within the scope of Transformers. Not sure about the redirect, but the current content needs to go and should not be merged. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  23:34, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Why are we tolerating these Transformers articles with sources that have been show to be unreliable. Dwanyewest (talk) 15:02, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Feel free to voice your opinion on the validity of the nomination, but spare us the complaining. What makes you think they are being "tollerated" when there are dozens being deleted? If they are being "tollerated" then they'd be kept. Mathewignash (talk) 16:18, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Surprisingly, I actually agree with Ignash. While it's arguable that we made a mistake by not finding these articles sooner, the community cannot reasonably be accused of "tolerating" them.  Community consensus against these is as clear as it could ever possibly be. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  21:23, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.