Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Squiptipadoogleboinkaflop


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:54, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Squiptipadoogleboinkaflop
This is a dictionary article in the wrong project, that is about a protologism that as far as I can tell has so far only been used by its creator. Uncle G 05:00, 22 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete as nominated, and nonsense to boot. -- JimR 06:57, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as nonsense. Borderline speedy. Jamie (talk/contribs) 12:15, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong delete nonsense. Incidentally, it "defines" what we are doing here. (ESkog)(Talk) 18:07, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, because I'm a Squiptipadoogleboinkaflopper Sceptre  ( Talk  ) 19:46, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Elaborate nonsense. PJM 01:46, 23 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.