Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Srbouhi Hairapetian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  11:15, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Srbouhi Hairapetian

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nominate for deletion basically an unreferenced BLP. Creator seems to have only worked on two articles - creating this and an article on the woman's husband, which was speedily deleted. Has been tagged as of unclear notability for over 5 years. Boleyn (talk) 13:21, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Translators are always hard but WorldCat shows only 37 holdings for the quoted book and the author's synopsis is rather bare. I don't think he meets WP:AUTHOR. § FreeRangeFrog croak 19:25, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * She, not he. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 12:56, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 10:49, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 10:49, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Armenia-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 10:49, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 10:49, 13 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Her book Hai Hin ev Mijnadarian Grakanutian Patmutiun (History of ancient and medieval Armenian literature) has been reviewed by the Armenian Review (Number 3, Fall 1987) . Another book, A History of Armenian Literature: From Ancient Times to the Nineteenth Century, has been recommended to the readers by and reviewed for example by the Journal of the Society for Armenian Studies (Cowe, S. Peter (2003), Vol. 12, pp. 90-93). In my opinon, Dr. Hairapetian is an important researcher in her country. I believe that editors familiar with the Armenian language and literature could find out more.  --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 12:56, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete; the question is whether the subject of this AfD is notable enough to be considered significant per WP:AUTHOR, WP:PROF, or WP:GNG. From what I can tell the subject's work is not largely cited in academic works and the subject does not appear to pass any of the notability guidelines that I previously listed.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:35, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e ! 17:54, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TBrandley (what's up) 10:35, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

 Delete Does not meet notability guidelines — Preceding unsigned comment added by Retrolord (talk • contribs) 09:56, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete per above. There simply aren't enough citations to suggest a pass of WP:PROF, and WP:AUTHOR is not, I feel, meant to cover cursory short reviews of academic books by other academics. Ray  Talk 17:32, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.