Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sree Narayana Central School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Narayana Guru. However, better redirection targets seem to exist. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 07:52, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Sree Narayana Central School

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable college, only has a primary source.  Yogesh Warah Talk 05:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:47, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  Yogesh Warah Talk 05:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.  Yogesh Warah Talk 05:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Yogesh Warah Talk 05:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions.  Yogesh Warah Talk 05:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Looking this over it's not a "college" as in a institution of higher learning. Plus, I don't think it's public either (not that it matters that much). So, it's not automatically notable and therefore WP:NORG applies. Sourcing wise, the article has zero references and doing a BEFORE only yields a few trivial name drops. In other words, from what I can (or more like can't) find there is nothing about this that passes either WP:NORG. Let alone WP:GNG. If anyone can come up with WP:THREE in-depth, independent sources I'd be happy to change my vote to keep though. Since it's possible (although extremely doubtful) that I just missed them. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:59, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Nominate/Contest for speedy deletion The institution fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. It is not a notable institution. Besides, this article doesn't have reliable sources, to be honest, it has zero references. Without sources, it can't be verified. That's why this article should be contested for speedy deletion . A.A Prinon 09:59, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * WP:A7 states that educational institutions can't be speedy deleted for lack of notability. The only way a school could be deleted is through WP:G3, if it is a blatant hoax or WP:G11, if the entire article is pure spam with no decent content. I don't think any of the G3 or G11 criteria apply here. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:40, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * That should really be changed now that the whole "schools are inherently notable" thing isn't one anymore. If nothing else it could cut back on the amount of clearly unnecessary, time wasting AfDs for schools that have been going on lately. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:48, 1 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Narayana Guru. It's not inherently notable, and the sources are weak and shallow. A student might be using this search term, so a redirect is cheap and easy. Bearian (talk) 17:13, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * P.S. It would fail my standards for high schools. Bearian (talk) 17:22, 7 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Procedural keep - another AfD started by the same block-evading sock Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:47, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Since other editors have suggested delete/redirect, this isn't a case of WP:CSK#4. — MarkH21talk 00:02, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect per nom and Bearian. Further reading in a parallel discussion (diff). I express principled opposition to procedural action here. — Alalch Emis (talk) 17:48, 12 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.