Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sree Narayana Guru High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  03:30, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Sree Narayana Guru High School

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NSCHOOL, unreferenced for 3 years now. Kolma8 (talk) 18:17, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Kolma8 (talk) 18:17, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kolma8 (talk) 18:17, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:23, 3 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge The correct procedure is to look for a merge. The article contains a Navbox, with links to other schools within that faith group so they need to be investigated first. If true this is an all-through school involving 3000 staff and children. Even if this is an English medium school- the likelihood is that most references will be in Hindi and that will tax our skills and is beyond me at the moment.
 * The reason for deletions is that this school fails WP:NSCHOOLS which honestly is a bit of a fudge, it sounds authoritative but is nothing of the kind. It is inaccurate, firstly non-profit making schools by definition are not covered by WP:ORG (See policy document). That leaves us with WP:GNG which is highly subjective. WP:NSCHOOLS advises us to read WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES- which since 2017 has contained the lines:
 * WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES should be added to the Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions, as it is an accurate statement of the results but promotes circular reasoning. and
 * References to demonstrate notability may be offline, and this must be taken into consideration before bringing a page to AFD.
 * The second sentence in WP:NSCHOOLS says For-profit educational organizations and institutions are considered commercial organizations and must satisfy those criteria. Does this mean, that the criteria named in sentence one, only apply to For-profit educational organizations, or is it trying to say in addition- profit making schools have to apply unnamed additional criteria?
 * I suggest that this paragraph of the document has little to offer and creates unnecessary confusion. It looks remarkably key touch similar to the paragraph beneath. It needs to be avoided until it has been revised. ClemRutter (talk) 17:14, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Any option for merging? Just checking re: WP:ATD.
 * Delete per nom. BEFORE yields nothing. Fails NSCHOOLS. VV 09:38, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.1друг (talk) 19:39, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 23:06, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2021 June 11.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 01:27, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom--Steamboat2020 (talk) 13:27, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Would you like to share your reasoning, and the Hindi sources you have visited? It would be good if you could comment on the other schools in this faith group and why are not proposing a merge? ClemRutter (talk) 14:53, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete From what little trivial information I was able to find this appears to be a private school. So it would have to pass the notability standards for organizations put forth in WP:NORG. Which it clearly doesn't. Even if it was a public school the article should still be deleted though IMO. Since there isn't even enough sources available for this to pass WP:GNG. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:24, 18 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.