Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sree Narayana Guru Institute of Science and Technology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 22:54, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Sree Narayana Guru Institute of Science and Technology

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article fails WP:NSCHOOL. Subject does not meet GNG. Powerful Karma (talk) 15:05, 26 May 2021 (UTC) strike per WP:SOCKSTRIKE and this. -- Beccaynr (talk) 06:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 15:05, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 15:05, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 15:05, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 15:05, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 15:05, 26 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:ORG Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 14:01, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Non-profits, such as this, do not have to pass the stricter standards of WP:ORG, but only WP:GNG. See WP:NSCHOOL. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:16, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: per no, WP:1S. Kolma8 (talk) 16:28, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
 * WP:1S is an essay that has garnered hardly any support in well over a decade (see its talk page) and is counter to the whole point of a Wiki. Can we have some opinions based on looking for sources rather than such ignorant clap-trap? Phil Bridger (talk) 17:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The only reference in the article is primary and all I could find about it is a brief name drop in an article about long hair. Which doesn't cut it WP:GNG. Let alone WP:NORG. Which IMO would be the proper notability guideline since this is not a mainstream educational institution and from my reading of them the guidelines are clear that none mainstream educational institutions need to pass WP:NORG. We don't even know if this place is for profit or not. Likely it is. To me the "ignorant clap-trap" is trying to treat every single organization with the words "institute" or "education" in them exactly the same by acting as if they are all on exactly the same level as the Harvard's or Indian Institute of Science's of the world just because "there's the words institute and education in the article. So it must be notable." When clearly that's not the standards for notability. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:10, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant coverage. Does not meet WP:ORG. Peter303x (talk) 06:09, 1 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.