Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sreedhar TN


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  06:20, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Sreedhar TN

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm obligated to bring this up to AfD because it was de-PRODded by an anon editor without substantial improvement. Original concern still stands: the article (created by an indeffed sock) fails to meet WP:CREATIVE notability standard. This is a non-notable film director. There is no evidence that any of his works have actually gained any critical commentary. We aren't even sure with what's in the article at this point that they were screened. Brianhe (talk) 17:59, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Brianhe (talk) 18:04, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Brianhe (talk) 18:05, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Brianhe (talk) 14:53, 7 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Non-notable director lacking significant coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 18:09, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * No need to delete this article
 * User:Neerawrites The article should come under the category of Stub. As I researched, the written information about the person is reliable and believable although the references are not enough. So stop delete the article Sreedhar_TN. Also it matches the ratings of Wiki project India. —Preceding undated comment added 14:36, 6 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: Not seeing anything other an interview for this person. It appears to be failing both, WP:GNG and WP:DIRECTOR. Anup   [Talk]  15:02, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable filmmaker.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:40, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as this is another example where some sources and information have been tossed in attempts to make any unknowing person think it's acceptable, but it's not and that's because they are simply 2 works and what's accompanied here is not suggestively better either, therefore no amounted substance. SwisterTwister   talk  22:47, 9 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.