Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Chandrasekhara Bharati I


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Jagadguru of Sringeri Sharada Peetham.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 00:32, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Sri Chandrasekhara Bharati I

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No sources to support notability since June 09. Delete Wikid as&#169; 08:30, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  09:42, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.  -- &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  09:43, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per A7. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  15:42, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Speedy deletion criteria does not apply, since the subject is supposed to have held a notable religious position. Sourcing may prove difficult due to the language barrier. Edward321 (talk) 05:36, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to Jagadguru of Sringeri Sharada Peetham per WP:ONEEVENT. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  15:50, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Redirect, per Armbrust. Jagadguru of Sringeri Sharada Peetham already has a list, so this is easy.  rudra (talk) 21:27, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect this and other one line stubs in the Sringeri Sharada Peetham category to the main article, Jagadguru of Sringeri Sharada Peetham, since the stubs contain no additional information. If and when someone finds detailed biographical sources for an individual Shankaracharya, a proper article can be created (c.f. Chandrasekhara Bharati III). I don't think AFDs is even needed for these cases since such mergers can be discussed and implemented by interested editors themselves. Abecedare (talk) 22:26, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.