Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Dasmesh Academy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Article meets SCHOOLOUTCOMES & GNG so closing as Keep (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 23:33, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Sri Dasmesh Academy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The educational institute with no significance at the state or national level. The article is full of primary sources. I had CSD-ed it but got declined with the reason that educational institutes are of significance. - Vivvt ( Talk ) 05:47, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Not a single source mentioned in the "two-liner" article suggest the creditability of the institute. - Vivvt ( Talk ) 10:16, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Isn't the appropriate test notability rather than credibility though, ? Cordless Larry (talk) 13:39, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * We are still awaiting for the creator (or any other editor, for that matter) to establish the notability through article content. - Vivvt ( Talk ) 13:46, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * That is established by the coverage in major newspapers, cited in the article, no? Cordless Larry (talk) 21:04, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:18, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:19, 30 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment: Generally educational institutes are considered notable if they are degree-awarding or affiliated with some education board. Means in Indian context if they are a school or college or university (private or deemed or government or govt-funded or such). What is this institute? Is it some coaching class? Then it is not notable unless it passes GNG. Article prose is not clear as to what it exactly is. Creator, can you elaborate? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:23, 30 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep: per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOME. It is a higher secondary school affiliated to C.B.S.E (source).  Anup   [Talk]  15:29, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Meets WP:GNG as well. Sources are cited in the article. Anup   [Talk]  15:44, 30 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. Meets WP:GNG. Just Chilling (talk) 21:07, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as a secondary school per longstanding consensus and precedent. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:11, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - meets WP:GNG. Cordless Larry (talk) 16:30, 5 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.