Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Gaudiya Vedanta Samiti


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Pigman ☿ 05:36, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Sri Gaudiya Vedanta Samiti

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable organization with very questionable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 21:12, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.   —Ism schism (talk) 21:15, 12 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Non notable religious organization. Sources are questionable. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 21:16, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * You're the nominator, you don't need to provide a !vote as well. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 21:24, 12 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, much of the article appears to be WP:OR violation, and what is not is cited to sources directly affiliated with the article's subject. Cirt (talk) 22:32, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sources are problematic, but a google search uncovers a bunch of third-party source information. Deletion should not be used as an easy way of remedying source/OR issues. Good Ol’factory (talk) 04:02, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Please feel free to add any reliable sources you find to the article. I have not been able to find any. Please share any information you find to establish notablity aside from Google searches. Google searches do not establish notability, and are not reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 04:10, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * As a matter of principle I generally don't edit the article that is the subject of an ongoing AfD. I didn't say google searches established notability or was a reliable source. I said doing a search uncovered some sources that for me established notability. Any editor can do the same and see what they think. Good Ol’factory (talk) 04:36, 13 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Because the article does not include citations from reliable sources, it does not appear to be in compliance with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 19:13, 13 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.