Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Hatakeswara Swamy Temple


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 21:09, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Sri Hatakeswara Swamy Temple

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Sri Hatakeswara Swamy Temple

Religious building which does not satisfy building notability because no independent sources have been provided. Only source provided is the temple's own web site, which is obviously not independent. Already moved once to draft space by User:Discospinster, and moved back to article space with no real improvement. A second unilateral move to draft space would be move-warring. Either draftification or deletion would be valid AFD outcomes. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:57, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:57, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:57, 24 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete there’s Tripadvisor and another tourist site but I don’t see any RIS in English. There may be sources in Telugu I can’t find, in which case I’d reconsider my !vote. Mccapra (talk) 20:59, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:43, 25 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete I always regret deleting articles about community spaces, as many temples are local landmarks and gathering places which people in the area know. In the case of this temple we simply have no information. There is a picture of the god but no sources or works to cite. I searched the English terms and found nothing, except the name from databases. We need citations.  Blue Rasberry   (talk)  17:36, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: coverage is weak and reliable sources not found. TheDreamBoat (talk) 04:24, 28 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.