Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Jayendra Golden Jubilee School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:17, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Sri Jayendra Golden Jubilee School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It has poor source and non reliable source, and failed to satisfy WP:ORG. ~AntanO4task (talk) 02:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep as a secondary school per longstanding precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:09, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Its a tricky choice as the school exists according to the official affliation portal "http://cbseaff.nic.in/" (the affliation no. is " 1930230"), but there is no verifiable independent source for its existence. Keep as per the existence of the school and community consensus about schools as per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES.  vivek7de  --tAlK  16:53, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. School board website confirms its existence. Not truly independent from the school because it is the central authority that governs it, but I would consider the source reliable enough to verify that the school isn't just made up. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:35, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - clear as day admits there's nothing to confirm its existence and I myself cannot find anything either, Consensus was to keep per schooloutcomes however consensus changes all the time and consensus for schools is that a source needs to confirm its existence which at the moment I can't find anything, As the saying goes "No source no article". – Davey 2010 Talk 22:53, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - Sources have been provided which confirms the schools existence so I see no reason to delete. – Davey 2010 Talk 22:07, 18 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - lacking coverage in independent sources. WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES makes it clear that articles about schools that lack independent sources have tended to be deleted in the past, and I haven't seen a convincing argument for making an exception here. Cordless Larry (talk) 06:50, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Added sources. One from the Ministry of Science and Technology. Another from the Central Board of Secondary Education, Government of India. And a third from the Tamilnadu Government. Lourdes  10:06, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: Okay, here are some secondary, independent and reliable sources that confirm the existence of the school. While it is possible, but, when did C.B.S.E registered a non-existent school? Anup   [Talk]  21:41, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment Hello Anup, like I mentioned in another Afd that you commented in, please first check the sources others have placed before suggesting sources that have no relevance to the article. It takes away the time of volunteer editors to check your wrong sources time and again. Take some effort and realize that the sources that you have quoted are of another school in Tirulenveli, some other place in Tamilnadu. Please don't take my suggestions otherwise, but you really need to do the first diligent step of checking your own sources before documenting them in discussions. Again, check the sources already provided in the article, the school exists. Please don't hesitate to ping me for more clarifications. Lourdes  03:00, 19 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.